When developing a new ingredient for use in fish feed, there is many parameters that needs to be scrutinized. And tunicate meal are no exception. During the last three years Marine Feed has tested the feed in three larger projects and more test are under process or evaluation.
A recent post from the industry newspaper Fish Farming Expert interview the expert Tor Andreas Samuelsen from the Norwegian research institute NOFIMA. Their work focus on different quality paratmeters of the feed pellet during and after process in an extruder.
One of the results was that feed pellets with a large percentage of tunicate meal had large pores and they also found that 50 % of the fish meal in standard feed can be replaced with tunicate meal without compromising the quality of the feed.
Yearly fish meal production in EU, within EU28 countries, is 496.000 tonnes/year, assuming a protein concentration of 60-72%.
The Ciona cultivation yield in Swedish waters are 58 ton meal/ha, with a 43% protein content in dry matter.
If we aim to replace all fish meal : 130km2 are needed which equals an 11 x 11 km area
If we aim to exchange 20% of the fish meal proteins; then 26km2 are needed = 5 x 5 km area
We believe that is doable.
https://marinefeed.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Marine-Feed-500px-300x147.png00Fredrik Norénhttps://marinefeed.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Marine-Feed-500px-300x147.pngFredrik Norén2020-05-10 10:46:172020-05-10 10:46:58Tunicate meal vs fish meal
“Marine Feed can produce zero CO2, organic fish feed– and at the same time remove excess nutrients from the sea”
Fredrik Norén, Founder Marine Feed
That is a rather bold statement. Is it posible? The short answer is, as often, both yes and no. Of course we use energy and material when producing feed ingredient, but in the world of Life Cycle Assessments (LCA:s) it is possible to combine two or more products consuming the same energy during its lifecycle. And since one of our products is nutrient uptake, that under certain circumstances, replaces nitrogen and phsophorous removal by municipality waste water treatment plants is it possible to be carbon footprint negative since nutrient removal has a very large carbon footprint.
This is how we reason:
Nutrient removal Nitrogen (N) and phosphorous (P) are vital macro-nutrients for phytoplankton growth and are mainly used in proteins and the energy system of the cell. Either fuelled by solar energy, where photosynthesis incorporates carbon and nutrients in the organisms, or by heterotrophic growth where the microorganism, primarily, eats other photosynthetic microorganisms – all microorganisms are food for Ciona growth and transfers the planktonic nutrients to the Ciona. This is a low-trophic harvesting system and since every transfer between trophic levels loses energy it is much more efficient in comparison to use top predatory fishes as a food or feed source. The second benefit of low-trophic harvest is that the lower in the food-web, the lower the concentration of bioaccumulated harmful contaminants, which is a problem for fish meal from fish species rich in fat.
When we harvest Ciona, we also remove N and P from the marine system. This counteracts eutrophication, which is excess of N and P in the water that makes phytoplankton and macroalgae grow too well. “Eutrophication is one of the most important and long lasting water quality problems in the EU“
Nutrient removal as a service
Using harvest of filter-feeders to remove N and P, when it already is in the water, are evaluated by Swedish authorities to be a compensatory measure. Using the same method is also considered a possibility to compensate N release from sea-based fish culture and other industries.
If we perform nutrient removal as a service, we can also add the ecosystem service of nitrogen removal to the carbon footprint calculation of the production system, see below. When harvest Ciona is used instead of ordinary N&P removal at a 50.000 persons municipality waste water treatment plant, it will replace the carbon footprint for the N & P removal of -0.36kg CO2e/kg Ciona meal (CO2e: CO2-equivalents, based on values from scientific literature and LCA made on our concept)
According to the latest LCA (see footnote 3) Ciona meal has a carbon footprint of 0.2 kg CO2e/kg Ciona meal. Our concept is always using industrial waste heat as a primary source of energy for boiling and drying.
 European Commission, and Directorate-General for the Environment. Guidance Document on Eutrophication Assessment in the Context of European Water Policies No 23. Luxembourg: Publications Office, 2009
 Parravicini, Vanessa, Karl Svardal, and Jörg Krampe. ”Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Wastewater Treatment Plants”. Energy Procedia 97 (november 2016): 246–53
 An LCA are made in the project AquaBioProFit by Dr Erasmo Cadena at Vertech Group, France
Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.
Essential Website Cookies
These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.
We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.
Other external services
We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.
Google Webfont Settings:
Google Map Settings:
Google reCaptcha Settings:
Vimeo and Youtube video embeds: